Skip to main content
Monthly Archives

October 2026

What Does “Free Palestine” Really Mean?

WHAT DOES “FREE PALESTINE” REALLY MEAN?

THE ANTI-ISRAEL MOVEMENT WANTS “FREE PALESTINE” TO SOUND SIMPLE. IT ISN’T.

“Free Palestine” has become one of the most recognizable political slogans in the world.

It can express concern for Palestinian civilians.

It can express support for Palestinian statehood.

It can also express something much more sweeping and much darker.

So before repeating the slogan, there is a question worth asking:

What exactly does “Free Palestine” mean?

AN INTENTIONALLY AMBIGUOUS SLOGAN

As journalist Jordyn Tilchen has previously written, the phrase “Free Palestine” is far more complicated than it sounds.

Free Palestine from what?

What borders are being envisioned?

Who governs this Palestinian state?

What happens to Hamas?

Does “freedom” mean two states — Israel and Palestine — living alongside one another?

Does it mean one binational state?

Or does it mean a Palestinian state replacing Israel entirely?

These are not minor details. They determine what “Free Palestine” actually means, and its ambiguity is precisely what has made the slogan so effective.

THE SAME THREE WORDS CAN DESCRIBE VERY DIFFERENT FUTURES

Imagine four people chanting “Free Palestine.”

One wants more humanitarian aid.

One wants an end to the fighting.

One supports an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel.

One believes Israel should cease to exist.

They are saying exactly the same words.

They are describing fundamentally different outcomes.

That ambiguity is part of the slogan’s power, and part of why the Palestinian movement championed the phrase.

FOR JEWS, THIS AMBIGUITY IS NOT ABSTRACT

Israel is the world’s only Jewish-majority state.

For Jews, it represents Jewish self-determination in their indigenous homeland after centuries of persecution, expulsion, and statelessness.

So when someone demands that Palestine be “freed,” the unanswered question becomes deeply consequential:

What happens to Israel and its people in the future being imagined?

WHAT THE PHRASE MEANS TO THE LEADERS OF THE PALESTINIAN MOVEMENT

Clearly, not everyone chanting “Free Palestine” wants Israel destroyed.

But by and large, the Palestinian diaspora, Jewish Voice for Peace, Hamas, Students for Justice in Palestine, and those guiding the Palestinian movement around the world understand exactly what the term really means.

It’s the eradication of the world’s only Jewish state.

For example, the chant “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” in Arabic is actually “From the water to the water, Palestine will be Arab.”

The mistranslation in English is intentional.

REAL-LIFE CONSEQUENCES

The darker meaning of the phrase cannot simply be dismissed as Jewish oversensitivity.

The phrase “Free Palestine” has accompanied actual violence against Jews in the United States, Canada, the UK, Australia, and elsewhere around the world.

For instance, in Washington in 2025, police said the man accused of killing two people at an AJC event shouted “Free, free Palestine” after his arrest.

In Boulder, less than two weeks later, prosecutors said an attacker threw Molotov cocktails at a gathering supporting Israeli hostages while yelling “Free Palestine,” killing an 82-year-old Jewish woman.

LET’S TALK ABOUT MACKLEMORE

When Macklemore shouts “Free Palestine” into a stadium microphone and thousands of people shout it back, there is no reason to assume everyone in that stadium means the same thing.

Some may envision Israelis and Palestinians eventually living peacefully in two states.

Many others, probably including the artist himself, envision a future in which Israel no longer exists.

LET’S TALK ABOUT ZACH BRYAN

Zach Bryan took the stage at Gillette Stadium wearing a “Free Palestine” shirt.

What did he mean by it?

Perhaps he means freedom.

Perhaps he means peace.

Perhaps he means Palestinian rights.

Those may genuinely be his intentions.

But many people in the audience may interpret his statement very differently.

A SLOGAN CAN UNITE PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY DISAGREE

That is what makes “Free Palestine” unusually effective as a political slogan.

It allows people with incompatible visions to stand together beneath the same words.

A supporter of coexistence can say it.

A supporter of two states can say it.

Someone who wants Israel dismantled can say it.

For a few seconds, they can appear to be demanding the same thing.

They are not necessarily demanding the same thing at all.

IF YOU MEAN PEACE, SAY IT

The leaders of the anti-Israel movement understand this, but do the people chanting it?

If you mean humanitarian aid, say it.

If you mean Palestinian self-determination, define it.

If you support two states living side by side, say it clearly.

And if the political vision requires the disappearance of Israel, that should be stated clearly too.

Palestinians deserve a future of dignity and self-determination.

Israelis deserve security and self-determination.

A serious conversation about peace has to make room for both peoples and reject a slogan that simply builds another barrier to peace.

Millions of parents trust Ms. Rachel. That trust comes with responsibility.

RACHEL HAS MILLIONS OF FOLLOWERS.
THEY DESERVE THE TRUTH.

Millions of parents and followers trust Ms. Rachel. With that trust comes responsibility.

When she shares claims about starving children in Gaza, the evidence deserves as much attention as the images.

Compassion matters. So does accuracy.

THE DEVASTATING IMAGES DON’T TELL THE REAL STORY.

Images of a few dozen severely malnourished children were circulated around the world as evidence of starvation in Gaza, but they omitted significant context.

As reported by The Free Press, images circulated by Ms. Rachel and others omitted critical information about the children’s underlying health conditions, such as cystic fibrosis, rickets and immune disorders.

Those children’s suffering was real. Sharing their images without medical context misled audiences.

THE CASE OF MARYAM DAWAS

One clear example of this deception.

In 2025, the Los Angeles Times described Maryam Dawas’s condition this way: “Doctors confirmed that her condition is solely the result of hunger and malnutrition.”

Her family’s subsequent fundraising campaign disclosed: “Maryam has a serious immune disorder that attacks her body every day, leaving her weak and vulnerable.”

Ms Rachel’s  audience deserved that information.

MS. RACHEL’S RESPONSE? “WHY DOES THAT EVEN MATTER?”

It matters.

A serious underlying medical condition can affect a child’s weight, appearance and nutritional vulnerability.

It matters when an image is presented to millions of people as evidence of population-wide starvation.

And it matters when those images contribute to accusations against Israel that reverberate around the world.

MS. RACHEL TALKS ABOUT STARVATION. HER AUDIENCE DESERVES THE ACTUAL DATA.

A UNICEF-led team published its latest comprehensive nutrition analysis of Gaza in July 2026.

Using weight-for-height measurements, researchers found acute malnutrition in just 0.5% of the children surveyed.

The survey also found stunting in about 12% of children surveyed.

That is less than the Middle East and North Africa’s 15% to 26% stunting rate, according to the latest report on child malnutrition by UNICEF, the World Health Organization, and the World Bank.

BUT THAT’S NOT ALL UNICEF FOUND

The UNICEF-led team’s presentation also revealed that Gaza now faces a new challenge: obesity and excess weight.

A leading researcher who has overseen teams collecting malnutrition data in the Horn of Africa remarked that she had “never seen” the emergence of obesity and excess weight in a place that was declared only a year earlier to be suffering from “famine.”

These findings paint a considerably more complicated picture than the one presented by Ms. Rachel and by the viral images.

THE WAY MALNUTRITION WAS MEASURED DURING THE WAR, WAS MISLEADING.

During the war, researchers said they had repeatedly been unable to collect weight-for-height data because of the conflict.

That meant assessments relied on the often inaccurate  mid-upper-arm circumference, or MUAC, measurements.

Those arm measurements identified more than twice as many cases than there actually were.

Yannay Spitzer, an applied economist in Boston, told The Free Press that the survey results show that the IPC’s famine declaration rested on an erroneous assumption that undermines its validity.

“It’s just another example of how flawed the methodology was.”

THE FAMINE THAT NEVER WAS

The famine narrative originated with reports from the IPC, a UN-aligned body working closely with several anti-Israel NGOs.

In March 2024, it predicted that Gaza would enter famine within four months, claiming that 39% of the population faced emergency-level food insecurity and another 30% had already reached catastrophic—or famine—levels.

Those claims were later rejected by the IPC’s own Famine Review Committee (FRC), an independent body tasked with evaluating IPC findings. In a June review, the FRC concluded it was “not plausible” that Gaza had entered famine.

Ms. Rachel never mentions any of this.

FAMINE HAS DEFINED CRITERIA.

There are three conditions that must be met for a food crisis to qualify as famine.

One of those requirements is that the death rate per day exceeds 2 deaths per 10,000 people overall or 4 deaths per 10,000 children under five.

In Gaza, that would have required the number of deaths due to famine reaching 440 people or 134 children under five, per day.

Nothing remotely approaching that occurred.

In September 2025, Al Jazeera reported a total of 361 malnutrition deaths over two years of war.

But the vast majority suffered from severe underlying health conditions.

MS. RACHEL AND THE IPC RELIED ON HAMAS

The IPC relied on Hamas-provided data that failed to account for private-sector food entering Gaza, ignored locally sourced food, and grossly overestimated the number of people located in areas it labeled at risk of famine.

For instance, the IPC again warned of famine conditions in parts of Gaza in August 2025 — claims that once more failed to materialize.

An October 2025 report by the Global Nutrition Cluster, which coordinates emergency nutrition responses, found that the malnutrition figures in Gaza were 23% lower than those used by the IPC.

This discrepancy stemmed from data manipulation, meaning the IPC’s own threshold for famine was not met.

MS. RACHEL WANTS HER AUDIENCE TO “SPEAK THE TRUTH.”


THAT STANDARD APPLIES TO HER, TOO.

The war in Gaza has caused tremendous suffering.

The public deserves more than viral photographs stripped of context and sweeping claims presented without scrutiny.

Every child deserves compassion.

Every humanitarian claim demands accuracy.

And an audience of millions deserves the full story.

WHO WAS ACTUALLY STARVING IN GAZA?

During the war, Israel facilitated nearly 1.87 million tons of aid into Gaza. After the October 2025 ceasefire, another 1.78+ million tons of food has entered, three times what the World Food Programme said was needed.

The Hostages Were the Ones Actually Famished

Former hostage Evyatar David, among the last captives freed, was filmed by Hamas digging his own grave. “You can see my body, I could barely move.” He and Guy Gilboa-Dalal “didn’t eat for three months.”

As he struggled, he could hear his guards “laughing, eating cakes and drinking tea.”

“They told us there is no food in Gaza, but we knew it’s not true, because we always saw the terrorists – they were fat and had muscles. We knew they were lying and starving us.”

X