Skip to main content
Category

Article

Gene Simmons Calls for Action Against Hate at CCFP’s Gala: ‘We Cannot Be Passive’

Read the original article here.

“Hate spreads like a cancer, and we must stop the hatred now,” the rocker adds at an event that also recognized Erin Foster, Lynn Harris, Kevin Weaver and Ethiopia Habtemariam

Gene Simmons, Erin Foster and Lynn Harris were among the honorees at the Creative Community For Peace’s eighth annual Ambassadors of Peace gala in mid-October. The event, hosted by the entertainment non-profit CCFP, was attended by 600 artists and industry leaders, there to support the list of honorees that also included Atlantic Music Group President Kevin Weaver and Hybe America’s President of Music, Ethiopia Habtemariam.

“Hate spreads like a cancer, and we must stop the hatred now. Today,” Simmons said at the event. “And we cannot be passive about it.”

Simmons was joined at the event by his wife and actress Shannon Tweed-Simmons, as well as his Kiss co-founder, Paul Stanley. The rockstar stopped by to talk to TheWrap before the event, echoing his sentiments about the night and his award.

“Awards are nice, but it’s about something that’s important, which is, we’ve got to all remind ourselves we live on this planet,” Simmons said. “I don’t want to get too cornball. There’s a lot of hatred going on. We’ve got to stop that, and it’s easier if you’re Jewish to talk about Jewish hatred, or if you practice Islam, you can talk about Islamophobia, or if you’re gay … there’s a lot of hatred going on. We’ve got to stop that.”

Among the night’s honorees was “Nobody Wants This” creator Erin Foster, attending the event held exactly one week before the release of her show’s third season. Foster, a convert to Judaism, used part of her speech to thank the Jewish community and CCFP for their acceptance.

“I want to thank the community here who has welcomed me to learn and grow with you and never making me feel like I don’t belong,” she said.

Foster wasn’t the only honoree with a big release on the way. The event, hosted on Oct. 15, came just over a week before honoree Lynn Harris returned to superhero cinema for the first time since producing 2004’s “Blade Trinity” with DC’s horror feature “Clayface” — the top film at the box office for its opening weekend.

“We are in an epic battle against an algorithm fed by misplaced rage and misinformation,” Harris said at the event. “The power of CCFP begins with that algorithm, helping us understand and distinguish the difference between noise and reality and uniting leaders and storytellers and empowering and encouraging us to take back our narrative.”

Legendary producer Jerry Bruckheimer, Grammy-nominated artist Keri Hilson, former Paramount CEO Sherry Lansing, producer Matti Leshem and music execs Carianne Marshall and Simon Tikhman were among those who turned out to honor the night’s award recipients. Previous honorees at CCFP’s Ambassadors of Peace event include Eugene Levy, Diane Warren, Liev Schreiber, Scooter Braun and Mayim Bialik.

Several of the night’s speakers reflected on the climate of the past three years following the Oct. 7 attacks of 2023, speaking to the organization’s overall message of fostering peace.

“We are living through a time of pain and division and in our creative community we have a responsibility to listen carefully, make room for different experiences and remember the human beings behind every story,” Weaver said at the event. “We can disagree and still care deeply about each other. That is why the work CCFP matters so much.”

“I will always be about peace first,” Habtemariam added in her acceptance speech. “I won’t allow people to be bullies or treat others like they don’t matter.”

The post Gene Simmons Calls for Action Against Hate at CCFP’s Gala: ‘We Cannot Be Passive’ appeared first on TheWrap.

Israel decries Venice Biennale protests as ‘intimidation’

Read the original article here.

Demonstrations outside the Israeli pavilion came after Italy’s government opposed efforts by Biennale organizers and jurors to exclude the Jewish state.

Israel’s Foreign Ministry on Saturday decried protests at the Israeli pavilion of the Venice Biennale art show, whose opening last week caused the jury to resign.

The protests weren’t activism but “intimidation,” the ministry said on X, adding: “Attempts to silence, isolate or harass Israeli artists and cultural representatives have no place in a democratic society or in the world of art. Culture should build bridges, not fuel hatred and exclusion.”

Hundreds of people were seen protesting outside the Israeli pavilion, which the event’s managers had tried to ban along with Russia’s, but which opened to the public after Italy’s culture minister expressed opposition to the boycott.

The five-member jury quit last week, saying only that the move was connected to the decision to ban Russia and Israel. Before it was reversed, the ban announced by management said that countries whose leaders are under investigation at the International Criminal Court. Currently, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Russian President Vladimir Putin are the only world leaders under investigation at the ICC.

The pavilion of Russia, which is the subject of E.U. sanctions, remains closed to the public and was open only during the press preview stage of the event, which opened last week, and where the artworks will remain on display until November.

Italian Culture Minister Alessandri Giuli on April 29 had a phone call with the Israeli pavilion’s artist, Belu-Simion Fainaru, to express solidarity in the face of “recent attacks.” Giuli also “confirmed the Italian government’s commitment against every form of discrimination and antisemitism in Italian cultural institutions,” his office said in a statement.

The contrast between the attitude of the Italian government, which funds the Venice Biennale, and the event’s managers has led to speculation that Giuli’s office intervened to reverse the boycott.

The government’s attitude was key to the boycott’s reversal, according to Ari Ingel, the Executive Director of Creative Community for Peace (CCFP), a non-profit organization consisting of cultural and entertainment industry leaders committed to artistic freedom and coexistence.

“Once the Italian government stepped in, the jury’s campaign to boycott Israel collapsed, which is why they resigned,” Ingel told JNS. “Given that Israel had a public pavilion, and that only Israeli artists would truly have been affected by the jury’s decision, it was clear this was an attempt to boycott Israel and Israeli artists by politicizing one of the world’s premier cultural events,” he said.

CCFP, founded in 2012, has worked to counter cultural boycott campaigns targeting Israel across music, film, television, literature and the arts. The attempt to bar Israel from the Biennale was a “test case” for the boycott movement, Ingel added.

“Had it succeeded, the boycott movement almost certainly would have tried the same tactic at the Venice Film Festival, which operates under the same Biennale umbrella,” Ingel said. “We likely would have seen efforts to discriminate against Israeli films and artists from awards consideration there as well. This was a moment where we needed to step in and make clear that such discrimination was unacceptable, and thankfully, the Italian government agreed.”

Boycott campaigns are far more likely to succeed in countries whose governments are more hostile toward Israel, Ingel said. “Unfortunately, in places like Spain or Ireland, you could very well see efforts to exclude Israel from major cultural events,” he told JNS.

After five countries quit Eurovision over Israel, over 1,000 entertainment figures push back

Read the original article here.

Over 1,000 entertainment industry leaders sign letter backing Israel’s inclusion in Eurovision, rejecting boycott efforts and emphasizing music’s unifying power.

More than one thousand leading entertainment industry figures have signed an open letter by the non-profit organization Creative Community for Peace (CCFP) to support Israel’s continued inclusion in the Eurovision Song Contest.

Israel has taken part in Eurovision since 1973 and has won four times, but in the past year, following Israeli contestant Yuval Raphael’s second-place finish in 2025, calls for Israel’s exclusion have been growing louder.

The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) declined to put the question of excluding Israel to a vote in its meeting in December, and five countries – Iceland, Ireland, the Netherlands, Slovenia, and Spain – announced that they were withdrawing from the 2026 Eurovision contest in Vienna in 2026 in response to the fact that Israel will take part as usual.Some countries alleged that Israel broke the rules in 2025 that led to Raphael winning the audience vote. The EBU investigated and found no wrongdoing, but instituted rule changes in response to criticism of Israel from some of the participating countries.

The initial letter by the CCFP was issued in response to the campaigns calling on the EBU to exclude Israel from the event and urging participating countries and artists to withdraw if Israel takes part.

PEN America’s Jewish Exception

Read the original article here.

For everyone else, free speech is a principle. For Jews, it appears negotiable.

By Ari Ingel

PEN America has quietly retracted its public statement condemning the cancellation of comedian Guy Hochman’s recent speaking engagements. In its original statement, PEN rightly “condemned placing a litmus test on someone to appear on stage,” calling such tests a “profound” violation of free expression and affirming that “shutting down cultural events is not the solution.”

That principled stance did not last.

This reversal is particularly striking given PEN America’s longstanding history of condemning the cancellation of controversial figures across the political spectrum, including music artist Kehlani (on two separate occasions) and political commentator Milo Yiannopoulos. PEN has even defended the right to gather for Moms for Liberty, an organization that actively fuels the book-banning campaigns PEN America claims to oppose.

In these cases, and many others, PEN defended a clear and consistent principle: Free expression must be upheld even when the speech is unpopular, provocative, or deeply offensive to some.

Yet, following internal and external pressure driven by anti-Israel—and, in many cases, overtly antisemitic—activism, PEN reversed itself. In doing so, it abandoned its own stated standards and effectively endorsed the very discrimination it had previously acknowledged as wrong.

The message this sends is unmistakable: PEN America supports free expression, except when Jews are involved. When it comes to Jewish artists and Israeli voices, PEN now appears willing to endorse ideological litmus tests, condemnation, cancellation, and boycotts.

Forcing an artist to renounce their identity, nationality, or presumed political views as a prerequisite is discrimination—plain and simple.

This incident does not stand alone. It follows PEN America’s recent deeply flawed report alleging that Israel intentionally sought to destroy Palestinian culture and education in Gaza, a report reliant largely on information supplied by Hamas, riddled with glaring omissions, and marred by demonstrably false and inflammatory claims.

By downplaying the atrocities and the horrors of Oct. 7 and largely dismissing Hamas’ own actions that led to the current situation in Gaza, PEN America further silenced Israeli and Jewish voices in literature and culture.

That bias is not confined to PEN America alone. It echoes the inherent bias, anti-Zionism, and antisemitism embedded in the recently passed “Resolution on Freedom of Expression in Palestine and Israel” at the 90th PEN International Annual Congress.

Notably, Palestine was granted membership in PEN International, while Israel was rejected, a decision that speaks volumes about whose voices are deemed worthy of protection and whose are excluded.

Compounding this pattern, PEN America forced out its longtime CEO, Suzanne Nossel, after she was labeled a “Zionist” and refused to have the organization publicly declare that Israel was committing genocide. This episode sent a chilling message to Jewish professionals: Adherence to certain political dogmas is now a prerequisite for leadership within the organization.

Taken together, these actions reflect an organization that has lost sight of its mission and gravely undermined its credibility. Art and literature should build bridges and foster dialogue, not be weaponized as tools of division and demonization. Yet this is precisely how PEN America is now operating.

Most concerning of all, these decisions have helped create an increasingly hostile environment for Jewish writers and cultural figures. And when it comes to defending Jewish authors, PEN America has been conspicuously silent.

Over the past two years, planned bookstore appearances by Jewish authors have been canceled, ads for books about Israel have been rejected, book readings have been shut down, literary groups have been targeted, and activists have circulated blacklists of so-called Zionist authors for harassment.

A few examples: PEN America issued no public condemnation of the McCarthy-esque “Is Your Favorite Author a Zionist?” list; no statement objecting to the targeting and cancellation of Gabrielle Zevin based on a presumed political identity; no statement defending the canceled book-launch events of Brett Gelman; no statement condemning the rejection of advertising for Bernard-Henri Lévy’s book; and no statement opposing the boycott of Israeli writers and cultural institutions.

By validating ideological litmus tests, PEN America is declaring that free expression is not a universal right, but a privilege granted only to those who pass the “correct” political screening. That is a shocking precedent for an organization that claims to defend the “freedom of expression.”

Forcing an artist to renounce their identity, nationality, or presumed political views as a prerequisite for participation is discrimination—plain and simple. It is incompatible with the values PEN America claims to uphold.

If PEN America wishes to retain any semblance of credibility as a defender of free expression, it must explain why ideological tests are unacceptable for everyone except Jews and Israelis.

In PEN’s own words, “Ultimately, shutdowns of this nature, however they occur, do little to address hateful speech, but instead contribute to a climate of silencing and self-censorship for artists with a wide range of views.”

Over the past two years, many leaders in the literary and cultural world have attempted to engage PEN’s leadership in good faith. The pattern has been consistent: They listen, offer no meaningful response, and then double down on a hostile anti-Zionist and anti-Israel posture.

In doing so, PEN America has helped legitimize antisemitic discrimination at a moment when antisemitism in the United States is at historic levels. This is not an isolated failure of judgment, but a structural rot in the organization, one that reflects leadership choices, institutional culture, and a governing board that has failed to intervene.

This past week, the organization formalized the leadership of interim co-executives Summer Lopez and Clarisse Rosaz Shariyf, a move that signals continuity rather than course correction and suggests the organization is unlikely to return to viewpoint-neutral principles anytime soon.

If PEN America is serious about its mission, its board must urgently reevaluate who is running the organization, issue a clear and public apology to the Jewish community, and recommit itself to defending free expression without exception or favoritism.

 

Ye’s Apology Is Not Nearly Enough (Guest Column)

Read the original article here.
An apology without meaningful, sustained change is simply a pause until his next cycle of hate begins.

 

Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, has issued another public apology.

Any rejection of hate is, in theory, a positive step. Antisemitism is on the rise globally and language from cultural figures with enormous reach matters. As we have recently seen in D.C., Boulder, and Bondi Beach, fomenting antisemitism and extremist rhetoric can lead to violence.

But context matters too, and so does history.

Since posting his apology in an ad in The Wall Street Journal on Monday, Ye has expanded on his statement in a lengthy email interview with Vanity Fai attributing his antisemitic and hateful comments and behavior to a four-month manic episode, bipolar disorder, and a traumatic brain injury stemming from his 2002 car accident.

This is not Ye’s first apology for his antisemitic statements and behavior. Over the years, he has repeatedly apologized, retracted, clarified, deleted, and reframed, only to later escalate again. That pattern cannot be ignored, particularly when apologies arrive at moments of commercial consequence.

This latest statement comes days before the release of his new album, Bully. That timing raises legitimate questions, especially given the scale and duration of the harm he has caused.

Ye’s conduct has gone far beyond offensive rhetoric. He has publicly praised Adolf Hitler, declared himself a Nazi, sold merchandise featuring a swastika via a Super Bowl commercial seen by millions, and promoted content explicitly invoking Nazi ideology, including the song “Heil Hitler,” which was recently played at a club in Miami before a crowd of attendees that included the likes of Andrew Tate and Nick Fuentes.

Mental illness and neurological injury can explain impaired judgment, impulsivity, or disinhibition. They do not explain the repeated adoption of an extremist ideology, and they do not absolve responsibility for amplifying hate. The overwhelming majority of people living with bipolar disorder or traumatic brain injury do not praise Hitler, promote Nazi symbolism, or traffic in antisemitic conspiracy theories.

These were not isolated remarks or misunderstood metaphors. They were deliberate, repeated actions that amplified extremist ideas to a massive audience, with real-life consequences. The ADL stated that numerous incidents – including violent attacks – were tied to Ye’s previous antisemitic rants.

His apology alone cannot undo that.

Accountability — real accountability — requires more than a statement. It requires sustained action, especially when the behavior spans years and has contributed to real-world consequences. Organizations that track antisemitism have documented how rhetoric from high-profile figures correlates with spikes in harassment and violence. This is not theoretical harm.

Furthermore, framing antisemitism primarily as a medical episode risks further harm. It stigmatizes millions of people living with mental illness who do not harbor hateful beliefs, while simultaneously minimizing the ideological nature of antisemitism itself.

If Ye is serious about change, responsibility would look like this.

It would begin with an explicit and unequivocal rejection of Nazism and antisemitism in all forms, the imagery he has promoted, and he should demand that “Heil Hitler” be pulled down from all social media platforms. Not ambiguity. Not generalities. Direct action.

It would also require accountability for the people and platforms he has chosen to associate with, individuals and movements that traffic in antisemitism and extremist rhetoric. Growth is demonstrated through choices, including who one no longer chooses to associate with.

It would include acknowledging that this behavior did not emerge during a moment of personal or financial collapse. Ye expressed admiration for Hitler years ago, when he was one of the most powerful and commercially successful artists in the world, well before the four-month period he now cites, and across multiple platforms, albums, interviews, and business ventures. This is a long-running issue and cannot simply be blamed on a car accident or personal struggles.

We also need to see sustained engagement with credible organizations that combat antisemitism and extremism, not as a public relations exercise, but through listening and reparative action. Performative outreach and engagement with fringe figures does not constitute accountability.

Free speech remains a fundamental right. But it does not obligate the public, or the entertainment industry, to endlessly reset expectations after repeated harm. There is a difference between defending artistic expression and continuing to excuse behavior that normalizes hate.

As leaders of Creative Community for Peace, we believe deeply in the power of culture to build bridges and foster understanding. That belief is precisely why accountability matters so much when culture is weaponized in the opposite direction.

An apology without meaningful, sustained change is simply a pause until his next cycle of hate begins. If this moment is truly different, the difference will not be found in a statement. It will be found in consistent action over time, without the proximity of an album release.

As an icon in the music industry, we hope his statement is sincere and marks the beginning of a different path forward. Compassion for mental illness and insistence on accountability are not mutually exclusive. In fact, they must coexist when public figures cause sustained, real-world harm.

The entertainment industry should know the difference, and until we see sustained, demonstrable change, we continue to echo the words of entertainment industry leaders Ari Emanuel and Jeremy Zimmer, who in 2022 both stated unambiguously that no one, and no companies, should be in business with Ye.

Ari Ingel is the executive director of the Creative Community for Peace, a non-profit in the entertainment industry focused on addressing antisemitism. David Renzer is the CCFP’s co-founder and chairman, and Steve Schnur is also a CCFP co-founder.

Adelaide Writers’ Week Has Failed Australian Jewry — And Its Leadership Must Be Held to Account

By Ari Ingel, Executive Director, CCFP

What has unfolded at Adelaide Writers’ Week is not a misunderstanding born of heightened emotions, nor an unfortunate clash of values. It is a systemic failure of judgment, governance and leadership, from top to bottom, and one that has inflicted real harm on Australia’s Jewish community at a moment of vulnerability in the wake of the massacre at Bondi.

To be clear, this did not begin with the decision to disinvite Randa Abdel-Fattah. It began with the decision to entrust the leadership of a major national literary institution to a director who had previously supported the boycott of a noted Jewish author, and who has made extremist remarks about the world’s only Jewish state, remarks that echo the language of a modern-day blood libel.

Louise Adler should not have been leading Adelaide Writers’ Week.

Her own public statements — including describing Israel’s actions as “genocidal” and framing scrutiny of extremist anti-Israel rhetoric as a form of McCarthyism — should have been disqualifying, particularly at a time of record levels of antisemitism in Australia.

Her remarks are incompatible with the responsibility of stewarding a major cultural institution that serves a diverse national audience, including a Jewish community for whom Israel is not an abstraction but the historical and national homeland of the Jewish people. A place of refuge.

In her worldview, to support Israel is to be labeled a supporter of genocide — and that framing has consequences.

Once Israel is cast as a Nazi-like state committing the ultimate crime of genocide, Zionism ceases to be a political position and becomes a moral stain. Because approximately 95% of Jews worldwide support Israel in some form, this logic renders Jews everywhere complicit in genocide. Jews are no longer innocent, but supporters and enablers of evil — and therefore legitimate targets.

We all saw the consequences of such language play out on December 14, 2025, at a Hanukkah celebration, when light turned to darkness.

Furthermore, in 2024 Adler supported efforts to have noted Jewish New York Times columnist and award-winning author, Thomas Friedman, disinvited from Adelaide Writers’ Week because of his views on Israel, despite his views often being very critical.

The Friedman incident alone should have prompted serious concern from the board. Combined with Adler’s rhetoric, it should have led to her removal long before this current crisis erupted. That it did not, renders the recently resigned board culpable. Governance is not passive. It requires intervention when leadership fails.

It also goes without saying that Abdel-Fattah should never have been invited to Adelaide Writers’ Week, a failure that further underscores why Adler should have been dismissed rather than permitted to resign.

Abdel-Fattah’s extremist remarks were well known and deeply troubling long before her invitation was issued. She has repeatedly described Zionism — a core component of Jewish identity for the overwhelming majority of Jews — as racism. She has argued that it is a “duty” to deny Zionists cultural safety, language that mirrors the logic historically used to exclude Jews from public life. She has openly called for sanctions against Israel.

Most egregiously, on October 8, 2023 — the day after Hamas carried out the deadliest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust — Abdel-Fattah posted imagery celebrating the paraglider motif used by Hamas terrorists to infiltrate Israel and massacre over a thousand civilians, as they raped, brutalised and kidnapped innocents. This included the murder of over 350 young people at the Nova music festival, itself a cultural gathering devoted to celebrating life through arts and culture. 

At a time of record levels of antisemitism, and in the immediate aftermath of mass Jewish slaughter, such conduct should have rendered her unfit for a prestigious public platform. The fact that it did not speaks volumes about Adler and the festival itself.

And to be clear, this should not be a debate about censorship. That is how the anti-Israel community has distorted the conversation. This is about the active fomenting of hatred and antisemitism.

Cultural institutions curate. Editors exercise judgment. Festivals decide whom they elevate. Declining to platform someone who has demonstrated open hatred toward a persecuted minority is not censorship; it is common decency.

Indeed, the selective nature of this newfound absolutism on “free speech” exposes the hollowness of the claim.

In 2024, Abdel-Fattah publicly supported a boycott call to have Friedman dropped from Adelaide Writers’ Week, signing onto an open letter to the board.

To the anti-Israel movement, free expression, it seems, is negotiable — depending on the speaker. This double standard is a defining feature of contemporary antisemitism, and now, suddenly, Abdel-Fattah is playing the victim. Palestinianism, in a nutshell.

The subsequent collapse of Writers’ Week and the new board’s response have only compounded the damage. The victims are once again the Jewish community of Australia, yet they are being recast as the aggressors.

Apologies have flowed — but conspicuously not to the Jewish community, which has borne the consequences of this failure. Instead, contrition has been directed toward those whose activism precipitated the crisis, while the community that has experienced a profound sense of betrayal has been left unacknowledged.

That is unacceptable.

The former director, the former board, and the current board all owe Australian Jews a clear, unequivocal apology — not for hurt feelings, but for abandoning their duty of care. For fomenting antisemitism. For creating an environment in which hostility toward Jewish identity was minimised, excused or rationalised. And for doing so at a time when Jews are confronting escalating fear, grief and isolation.

The only thing the board got right was cancelling Writers’ Week, since the rot runs deep and the current board should step down immediately as well.

If Adelaide Writers’ Week cannot operate without eroding the trust of a community that has contributed so profoundly to Australia’s cultural life, then its suspension is not a loss. It is a corrective.

To be clear, Australian Jewry was just targeted again. This is yet another attack in a long line over the past few years in a coordinated effort by a movement to silence the Jews of Australia and push them to the margins — or out of the country altogether.

Until those responsible are willing to reckon with their own failures, no apology — however eloquent — will suffice.

Cover Photo: Asset id: 2565890935 – Adelaide, South Australia, Australia – December 11 2024: Adelaide Convention Centre, on North Terrace, seen across the river Lake Torrens. Low angle view. Copy space in water

London venue ‘appalled’ after antisemitic imagery allegedly screened at Primal Scream gig

Read the original article here.

Roundhouse apologises after animation projected behind band appears to show Star of David entwined with swastika

A music venue in London has apologised after antisemitic imagery was allegedly displayed on stage during a Primal Scream gig.

A video appearing to show the Star of David entwined with a swastika was said to be screened during the Scottish band’s show at the Roundhouse in Camden on Monday.

The graphics were allegedly displayed behind the band as they performed their song Swastika Eyes during a one-off gig.

A spokesperson for the Roundhouse said they were “appalled that antisemitic imagery was displayed” at the venue, adding that it had been done without their knowledge.

“We deeply regret that these highly offensive images were presented on our stage and unequivocally apologise to anyone who attended the gig, and to the wider Jewish community. The content, which was used entirely without our knowledge, stands against all of our values.”

The spokesperson said the venue “absolutely condemns antisemitism in every form”. They continued: “Acts of hatred, discrimination or prejudice of any kind are entirely unacceptable and have no place in our community or spaces. The safety of our staff and gig-going audiences remains of paramount importance to us.

“We stand in solidarity with the Jewish community and remain committed to ensuring that our spaces are places where everyone feels secure, respected and valued.”

Primal Scream, founded by frontman Bobby Gillespie in 1982, were performing a 25th anniversary show for their album XTRMNTR.

As the band performed the song, pictures of political figures, including the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and the US president, Donald Trump, appeared behind them with an animation of the swastika combined with the Star of David replacing their eyes.

Images of the destruction in Gaza were also shown on screen. The video concluded with the words: “Our government is complicit in genocide.”

The Community Security Trust, which offers security, advice and training to protect British Jews, released a statement saying it had reported the band to the police and urged the venue to conduct an “urgent investigation”. A CST spokesperson said: “Entwining a Star of David with a swastika implies that Jews are Nazis and risks encouraging hatred of Jews.

“There needs to be an urgent investigation by the venue and the promoter about how this happened, and we have reported this to the police.”

The Creative Community for Peace, a pro-Israel advocacy group that campaigns against antisemitism in the entertainment industry, described the display as “an act of profound malice, desecration, and cruelty”.

It said: “The Star of David is a sacred symbol of Jewish identity; the swastika is the emblem of a genocidal regime responsible for the murder of 6 million Jews. To merge these two symbols is an act of profound malice, desecration, and cruelty. It is antisemitism in its starkest form.”

Primal Scream and the Metropolitan police have been approached for comment.

Proceeding as Planned Israel Can Compete in Eurovision After Organizers Decided Not to Vote on a Ban

Read the original article here.

Several countries, including Ireland and Spain, announced they would boycott the event over objections to Israel’s war with Hamas

By Kory Grow

Israel can compete in the 2026 Eurovision contest after organizers decided not to hold a vote about whether or not to disqualify the country. “A large majority of Members agreed that there was no need for a further vote on participation and that the Eurovision Song Contest 2026 should proceed as planned, with the additional safeguards in place,” the European Broadcasting Union, a group of broadcasters that air the contest in 56 countries, said in a statement, according to CNN.

The organizers had met in Geneva, Switzerland, on Thursday to discuss how to address Israel’s role in the competition after some members said they would boycott the event if the country, embroiled in a war with Gaza since 2023, was allowed to compete. Ultimately, EBU members “backed a set of targeted changes to the Eurovision Song Contest rules designed to reinforce trust, transparency and the neutrality of the event.” The new rules aim to reduce the roles of governments and third parties in influencing voting outcomes; some broadcasters accused Israel of using those methods to rally behind its 2025 competitor, Yuval Raphael.

Nevertheless, several countries have decided to boycott the event over the war. Ireland, Spain, the Netherlands, and Slovenia have chosen not to compete now that Israel qualifies, according to the BBC. Ireland’s RTÉ released a statement saying it felt “participation remains unconscionable given the appalling loss of lives in Gaza and the humanitarian crisis there, which continues to put the lives of so many civilians at risk.”

Israel’s president, Isaac Herzog, thanked the EBU for allowing his country into the competition. He called the decision on social media “an appreciated gesture of solidarity, brotherhood, and cooperation, symbolizing a victory over those who seek to silence Israel and spread hatred.”

The Creative Community for Peace, a nonprofit organization opposed to a cultural boycott of Israel, issued a statement saying the EBU “made the right decision.” Via the CCFP, Kiss vocalist-bassist Gene Simmons said, “Those advocating to exclude Israelis from Eurovision don’t move the needle toward peace—they only further divide the world.” Industry exec Scooter Braun said, via the CCFP, “Artists should never be discriminated against for who they are, who they love, or where they’re born.”

Some countries have yet to announce an opinion on the matter. Iceland and Belgium had not decided whether or not they would participate, according to the BBC, which itself said it had not decided yet whether or not it would compete. Germany, CNN reports, is backing Israel.

The Eurovision Song Contest, launched in 1956, last year drew an estimated 166 million viewers worldwide. The 2026 competition will be held in May in Vienna, Austria.

Cover Photo: Getty Images – Credit: Sebastian Reuter / Stringer

Jewish Entertainment Group Says Ireland, Spain’s Eurovision Boycott Over Israel’s Admittance ‘Would Only Punish Their Own’

Read the original article here.

By: Benjamin Lindsay

Israel was cleared by the European Broadcasting Union to enter the music contest on Thursday

Jewish entertainment nonprofit Creative Community for Peace denounced Thursday boycotts against the Eurovision Song Contest from a number of countries, including Ireland and Spain, after Israel was cleared to participate in the 2026 competition.

“The entertainment community is appalled by threats from several countries to withdraw, which would only punish their own citizens and fans of the contest,” a spokesperson for the group said in a statement. “We urge them to reconsider and uphold Eurovision’s core principle: to unite people and the world through a shared love of music.”

The European Broadcasting Union cleared Israel for admittance to the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest on Thursday after meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, and declining to hold an official vote on the matter. Response was swift from Spain, Ireland, the Netherlands and Slovenia, who all stated they would not participate in the 70th edition, citing Israel’s military conflict in Gaza. The competition is scheduled for Vienna, Austria, in May 2026.

“We would like to express our serious doubts about the participation of Israeli broadcaster KAN in Eurovision 2026,” secretary general of Spanish broadcaster RTVE Alfonso Morales said in a statement. “The situation in Gaza, despite the cease-fire and the approval of the peace process, and Israel’s use of the contest for political purposes, make it increasingly difficult to maintain Eurovision as a neutral cultural event.”

Morales acknowledged the European Broadcasting Union’s passage of new competition rules to stop governments of participating nations from influencing Eurovision’s voting process, but emphasized, “We consider these measures insufficient.”

In a statement obtained by the New York Times, Ireland’s national broadcaster RTÉ said competing alongside Israel was “unconscionable given the appalling loss of lives in Gaza and the humanitarian crisis there.”

A union vote on Israel’s participation was initially set in September, but later postponed after Israel and Hamas called a cease-fire in Gaza. The decision came after Israeli participants Eden Golan in 2024 and Yuval Raphael in 2025 have been met with protests at the international competition and harassment on social media.

Creative Community for Peace was among the many Jewish organizations and figures in the entertainment industry to applaud the European Broadcasting Union’s decision.

“The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) and the majority of its member states made the right decision to maintain Israel’s place in the Eurovision Song Contest and refuse to yield to pressure from the anti-Israel boycott movement,” a spokesperson for the org said, adding that the competition “highlights the unifying power of music and brings people together from all backgrounds.”

Israeli President Isaac Herzog also commended the broadcasting group’s decision, stating in a social media post Thursday that “Israel deserves to be represented on every stage around the world.”

Read the Creative Community for Peace statement in full below:

The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) and the majority of its member states made the right decision to maintain Israel’s place in the Eurovision Song Contest and refuse to yield to pressure from the anti-Israel boycott movement.

It is for this reason that more than 400 entertainment leaders, including Helen Mirren, Liev Schreiber, and Boy George, signed Creative Community for Peace’s open letter last year supporting Israel’s continued participation and rejecting efforts to turn Eurovision into a political weapon.

Scooter Braun noted, “Artists should never be discriminated against for who they are, who they love, or where they’re born. These boycott efforts do nothing but distract from the uplifting and unifying power of music—something we need now more than ever.”

Gene Simmons echoed this sentiment, saying, “Music unites people from all backgrounds. It’s the one language that everyone can understand. Those advocating to exclude Israelis from Eurovision don’t move the needle toward peace—they only further divide the world.”

Israel also has a long and celebrated history in Eurovision, which includes winning the Contest in 1978, 1979, 1998, and 2018 and having a diverse group of contestants representing the country, including Palestinians, Ethiopians, and members of the LGBTQIA+ community.

Every year, millions across Europe and around the globe join in this extraordinary celebration of cultural exchange—one that highlights the unifying power of music and brings people together from all backgrounds.

This is why the entertainment community is appalled by threats from several countries to withdraw, which would only punish their own citizens and fans of the Contest.

We urge them to reconsider and uphold Eurovision’s core principle: to unite people and the world through a shared love of music.

Cover photo: Yuval Raphael representing Israel performs for the 69th Eurovision Song Contest on May 17, 2025. (Sebastian Reuter/Getty Images)

 

A Creative Community for Human Connection

Read the original article here.

By David Suissa

Sometimes, the most creative act of a creative community is to gather people under the stars and enable the magic of human connection.

At a glittering gala the other night for Creative Community for Peace (CCFP), with 500 guests mingling under the stars at Haim Saban’s house listening to famous rockers, I reflected on the name of the organization.

Of course, any group with the word “peace” in its name can do no wrong. Indeed, on its home page, CCFP bills itself as a non-profit comprised of prominent members of the entertainment industry “dedicated to promoting the arts as a bridge to peace.”

Peace has always been the ultimate goal of conflict resolution. When we dream, we dream of peace. If you love life, you love peace. If you have peace, you can love life.

The enemy of peace is hate. In recent years, the special hate reserved for Israel has been a terrible enemy of peace. It has led to ugly boycotts of artists who try to perform in Israel. These boycotts kill peace.

And yet, for all my love of peace, what struck me at the gala the other night was not peace but something deeper. As I mingled through the crowd with a friend, we were immersed in human connection— in people engaging with one another.

At every CCFP event I’ve attended, this sense of human connection has stood out. The events are never static. You’re on the move meeting people and creating connections.

Given that CCFP has a serious mission to “educate about rising antisemitism” and “galvanize support against the cultural boycott of Israel,” where does this notion of human connections come in and how does it relate to peace?

As I see it, creating human connections is the ideal road to peace.

What CCFP creates, above all, are human connections.

When it supports artists who perform in Israel, it is creating connections.

When it gathers people from the entertainment industry to hear about its cause, it is creating connections.

When it steers clear of politics and focuses on the human power of art to bring people together, it is creating connections.

Creating connections is the action that helps “educate” and “galvanize support.” If peace is the dream, creating connections is the act that gives hope to that dream.

Sometimes, the most creative act of a creative community is to gather people under the stars and enable the magic of human connection.

That connection is what I felt the other night.

X