Skip to main content
All Posts By

CCFPeace

NEW YORK MAGAZINE HAS BECOME AN ANTI-JEWISH HATE OUTLET

New York Magazine’s new Habibi City issue is the latest example of an editorial pattern that has been building since October 7, 2023.

For nearly three years, New York has repeatedly portrayed Israel through the libelous accusations of colonialism, apartheid, and genocide. Now that same worldview is being applied to Jewish history, Israeli identity, Zionism, culture, food, and even the question of who gets to belong in the Middle East. This goes far beyond criticism of Israeli government policy. This is anti-Jewish hatred.  It is time to expose this hate.

ZIONISM IS NOW SOMETHING PEOPLE “FACE”

In Habibi City, New York writes that SWANA New Yorkers still “face xenophobia, Islamophobia, and Zionism.”

Read that sentence carefully. Xenophobia is hatred directed at foreigners. Islamophobia is prejudice directed at Muslims.

Zionism is the movement for Jewish national self-determination in the Jewish people’s ancestral homeland.

Yet New York places Zionism alongside forms of bigotry as another hostility people must “face.”

That is a profoundly hostile way for a mainstream American magazine to portray Jewish national self-determination – as another social harm inflicted on others.

THEN COMES THE IDENTITY TEST

The contradiction inside the article is remarkable.

The article itself presents SWANA as a ‘decolonial framework,’ rejecting the term ‘Middle East’ & MENA as a Western construct. Yet inside this supposedly decolonized framework, Jewish and Israeli belonging somehow becomes the part that is ‘complicated.’

New York acknowledges that Zohran Mamdani is “not technically from the SWANA region.”

No problem.

He is described as “deeply embedded in its culture” and happily “SWANA adjacent.”

Then the article turns to Israelis and asks whether Israelis can truly claim a connection to the region. It becomes “complicated.”

Why does that belonging suddenly become ‘complicated’ when the people concerned are Jews and Israelis?

When Jewish and Israeli identity enter the picture, belonging suddenly requires an explanation.

JEWISH HISTORY DOES NOT NEED A PERMISSION SLIP

Jews did not suddenly appear in the Middle East with the creation of Israel in 1948.

Jewish communities lived throughout the region for centuries and, in some places, for millennia.

In what is now Iraq alone, Jewish communities existed from at least the sixth century BCE. Jerusalem has been a majority Jewish for centuries.

Generations of Jews lived across the land of Israel, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Syria, Egypt, Lebanon, and North Africa. Their languages, music, food, traditions, and memories are part of the history of the region.

Yet New York tells readers that whether Israelis can claim a connection to this region is “complicated.”

Jewish Middle Eastern history is ancient. The discomfort with acknowledging it is Jew hatred.

EVEN THE FOOD GETS RETROACTIVELY NATIONALIZED

New York repeatedly describes dishes shared across the Levant as “Palestinian,” then casts Israeli Jews as appropriators for cooking them.

But, these foods are older than today’s borders and modern national identities, including Palestinian national identity.

For centuries, the region was home to overlapping Arab, Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Ottoman, Syrian, Jerusalemite, Damascene, Aleppine, and other communities. Modern Palestinian national identity developed much later, primarily in the late Ottoman and early twentieth-century periods.

Jews were already living in Jerusalem, Hebron, Safed, Tiberias, and elsewhere long before the establishment of modern Israel, long before modern political Zionism, and certainly long before anyone called this region “Palestine.”

So yes, a dish can be called Palestinian today. But presenting centuries-old regional foods as exclusively Palestinian, then accusing Jews of stealing them, rewrites the history of the region.

Shared regional cuisine does not become cultural theft because Jews are cooking it.

NOT SURPRISING. NEW YORK HATRED STARTED DAYS AFTER OCTOBER 7

Look at the record.

OCTOBER 13, 2023

Six days after the Hamas massacre, New York ran:

“The U.S. Is Giving Israel Permission for War Crimes”

OCTOBER 16, 2023

Nine days after the Hamas massacre, New York published an essay describing American support for Israel as

“as though having been through genocide entitled them to commit it.”

The author also accused Israel of decades of “colonial repression” and defended describing Israel through the framework of apartheid.

​​The hostility was already on full display while Israel had barely begun responding to the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.

THE HATRED KEPT ESCALATING

FEBRUARY 2024

New York published:

“What Happens If Israel Is Found Guilty of Genocide?”

The framing asked whether America could become implicated in what it called “the worst crime.”

JUNE 2025

A major New York cover story was titled:

“ISRAEL’S CRIMES OF THE CENTURY”

Inside, the author wrote that what was happening in Gaza was “not really a war” and described it as the “ceaseless pummeling of one side by the other.”

AUGUST 2026

Now Habibi City tells readers that Zionism is something SWANA New Yorkers “face.”

This latest issue is nothing new. It is simply the latest hate piece in a long line of anti-Israel literature from this once reputable outlet.

NOW “GENOCIDE” IS PART OF THE IDENTITY TEST

Habibi City explains what it means

“to be in SWANA community.”

The author says it means embracing certain “shared beliefs.”

Among them:

“That what happened in Gaza in the aftermath of October 7 constitutes a genocide.”

Think about what New York is presenting here.

A modern day blood libel against the Jewish state is being woven into a description of cultural and political belonging.

Creative Community for Peace categorically rejects the genocide accusation.

Tellingly, Habibi City presents this libel as one of the beliefs holding their community together. A community built on a lie.

THE DOUBLE STANDARD IS IMPOSSIBLE TO MISS

Throughout the issue, communities are celebrated for embracing their homeland, ancestry, inherited memory, political consciousness, food, language, and collective identity.

Then Jewish and Israeli identity enter the story.

Zionism becomes a social hostility.

Jews belonging to the Middle East become “complicated.”

Israeli cuisine becomes a story of appropriation and privilege.

Israel becomes “the land mass currently called Israel.”

Again and again, Jews and Israelis are demonized.

There is nothing progressive about demanding that Jews surrender their right to self-determination before their history, culture, and identity become acceptable.

JEWISH BELONGING REQUIRES NO ONE’S PERMISSION

Criticism of Israeli policies and governments is legitimate. Israelis themselves engage in it every day.

The lies and misinformation New York Magazine has published over nearly three years are shameful.

When a publication repeatedly casts Jewish national self-determination as sinister, Israeli identity as suspect, Jewish regional belonging as questionable, and the Jewish state through the vocabulary of colonialism, apartheid, and genocide, the cumulative effect cannot simply be waved away as criticism of a government.

For Creative Community for Peace, this is antisemitism.

We will continue standing against the cultural demonization and isolation of Israel and the Jewish people.

Jewish identity needs no loyalty test.

Israeli culture needs no apology.

Zionism should never be treated as a form of hate.

Statement from the Creative Community for Peace Literary Alliance

Alyssa Rosenheck’s book, White. Blonde. Jew., was written in response to the growing campaign to marginalize, boycott, and silence Jewish and Israeli voices in the literary world. Her book event was cancelled in Nashville and she’s become the latest victim of that very phenomenon.

Over the past several years, planned bookstore appearances by Jewish authors have been canceled, ads for books about Israel have been rejected, book readings have been shut down, literary organizations have been targeted, and activists have circulated blacklists of so-called “Zionist” authors for harassment.

Just last month, PEN America’s President resigned because the organization simply documented the experiences of Jewish and Israeli writers. This reveals just how difficult it has become for even free expression organizations to acknowledge antisemitism within the literary community.

Alyssa Rosenheck wrote White. Blonde. Jew. to shine a light on this growing intolerance. The decision to cancel her event only proves how necessary her voice—and this conversation—have become.

A documentary should present evidence, not selectively edit reality to fit a political narrative

American Doctor asks viewers to accept sweeping accusations against Israel while omitting critical facts: the featured doctors’ longstanding anti-Israel activism, Hamas’s documented use of Gaza’s hospitals, U.S. intelligence findings, hostage testimony, independent reporting, and even Palestinian witnesses who exposed Hamas’s abuse of medical facilities.

Before accepting the film’s narrative, take a look at everything it chose to leave out.

AMERICAN DOCTOR – A TALE OF LIES
A documentary about Gaza’s hospitals asks audiences to accept a sweeping verdict while withholding facts that directly challenge its narrative.

Before you accept the film’s conclusions, examine what the film chose to leave out.

THE SUFFERING WAS REAL. THE STORY IS MISINFORMED.
Gaza’s hospitals treated horrific casualties under difficult conditions. The war in Gaza was a brutal urban war launched by Hamas on October 7 on a battlefield the terror group created to maximize civilian casualties.

While these doctors can describe wounds, shortages, and what they personally witnessed, the film whitewashes who these doctors were and their deep-seated biases.

THE FILM FOLLOWS THESE ACTIVIST DOCTORS AND CALLS IT EVIDENCE
No military experts.
No hostage testimony.
No serious examination of Hamas inside Gaza’s hospitals.

The project’s own materials call it a “political and medical thriller,” with no sit-down interviews or expert commentary, just manipulated pieces of footage. In other words, an edited tale of fiction.

Its official synopsis follows the doctors from Gaza to the halls of Congress, creating an air of credibility where there is none.

WHO ARE THESE THREE DOCTORS?
THAER AHMAD WAS A PALESTINIAN ACTIVIST LONG BEFORE THE WAR
Ahmad’s political involvement did not begin after a hospital mission.
● He first traveled to Gaza in 2009.
● He returned repeatedly.
● He serves on the board of the Palestinian American Medical Association, an organization with a long history of anti-Israel activism.
● He publicly campaigned against U.S. support for Israel.
● He walked out of a White House meeting in an intentional act of activist protest.

The film presents his politics as the natural result of what he witnessed. His advocacy had deep roots long before October 7.

FEROZE SIDHWA’S ANTI-ISRAEL ACTIVISM GOES BACK TWO DECADES
Sidhwa publicly portrayed himself as an American with no connection to the conflict.

His record tells a different story.
● He spent extended periods in Israel and the Palestinian territories.
● He wrote anti-Israel pieces as early as 2007.
● He helped edit multiple works by anti-Israel conspiracy theorist Norman Finkelstein.
● He later appeared on Iran’s state-run Press TV.

Far from a disinterested medic who wandered into a war zone, he is a lifelong anti-Israel activist with a deep religious conviction and a paper trail stretching back nearly two decades. He then mounted a carefully orchestrated campaign to launder himself into the mainstream.

He arrived in Gaza with an established ideological position. The film hides all of this.

MARK PERLMUTTER’S VERDICT CAME BEFORE THE WOUNDS

Perlmutter treated horrific injuries, but he described Gaza as worse than all the disaster zones he had previously encountered combined. There is only one problem: he had never served in a war zone.

According to his own résumé, he had served only in disaster zones affected by events such as hurricanes and earthquakes.

Perlmutter had never seen war up close, let alone how a terrorist group like Hamas fights its wars. Yet he emerged from his first experience in an active war zone making sweeping allegations of genocide, deliberate child murder, and systematic Israeli criminality, claims that extended far beyond anything his clinical observations could establish.

His public statements further call his objectivity into question. On X, Perlmutter equated Zionism with Nazism and claimed that Hamas affiliates constituted just 0.01% of Gaza’s population—roughly 200 people—despite estimates placing Hamas’s armed force alone in the tens of thousands.

What he certainly must have known was that Hamas summoned Gazans into hospitals and turned those facilities into centers of interrogation and torture. He does not mention any of that.

THE THREE DOCTORS MADE LAUGHABLE CLAIMS
Two of the film’s featured doctors signed a letter declaring: “Not once did any of us see any type of Palestinian militant activity in any of Gaza’s hospitals.”

The third doctor separately said he saw no indication that Hamas was operating inside hospitals.

THE TRUTH: HOSPITALS WERE AMONG HAMAS’S MOST VALUABLE MILITARY ASSETS

Throughout the war, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad repeatedly used hospitals to conceal commanders, move hostages, store weapons, operate underground infrastructure, and intimidate civilians.

THE PUBLIC RECORD OF HAMAS’S USE OF HOSPITALS IS CLEAR
● U.S. intelligence on Al-Shifa
● First-person hostage testimony about Nasser
● A Reuters tour of a tunnel beneath European Hospital
● MSF reports of masked armed men, arrests, intimidation, and suspected weapons movement at Nasser

None of these sources is Israeli, and they are independent of one another.

AL-SHIFA HOSPITAL – HAMAS’S CENTRAL BASE OF OPERATIONS
A declassified U.S. intelligence assessment found that Hamas and Islamic Jihad used Al-Shifa and sites beneath it for their war efforts. The United States said the intelligence was independently corroborated.

● It served as a headquarters for Hamas leaders and military operations.
● It contained an extensive tunnel network for command, escape, and communications.
● It was used to transport hostages on October 7.
● Weapons and explosives were stored in hospital wards and basements.
● Senior Hamas operatives directed attacks from inside the facility.
● Attacks were launched from the hospital grounds under medical cover.
● Fighters were embedded among patients and medical staff as human shields.

NASSER HOSPITAL – HOSTAGE AND OPERATIVE HIDEOUT
A released Israeli hostage said she and more than two dozen other captives were held inside Nasser Hospital.

The film asks audiences to accept that visiting doctors saw no militants, yet a hostage described being imprisoned inside the hospital itself.

The bodies of hostages were held at the facility. Hamas operatives were sheltered there. Ambulances were used to transport Hamas operatives and hostages.

NASSER HOSPITAL – ANTI-ISRAEL NGO CORROBORATES THE CLAIMS
Don’t believe a former hostage or the IDF? In 2026, Doctors Without Borders, also known as MSF, suspended work at Nasser after its staff reported:
● Armed and masked men
● Intimidation
● Arbitrary arrests of patients
● Suspected weapons movement

MSF has repeatedly condemned Israel’s conduct in Gaza. Even MSF could no longer ignore armed activity inside the hospital.

EUROPEAN HOSPITAL
HAMAS’S MILITARY CHIEF WAS FOUND BELOW IT
Israeli forces killed Mohammed Sinwar, Hamas’s leader in Gaza, and other senior operatives in a tunnel beneath European Hospital.

Weapons, ammunition, cash, and intelligence materials were recovered.

Reuters reporters toured the tunnel after the operation.

Yet Feroze Sidhwa and Mark Perlmutter worked at this hospital and insisted they saw no evidence of Hamas. Not that the film chose to disclose Sinwar was using the hospital as cover for his command center in any event.

RANTISI HOSPITAL – A CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL ALSO USED BY HAMAS
● Hostages were held in the basement alongside a command center.
● Grenades, suicide vests, and explosives were stored there.
● The site was used to hide hostages and transport them by motorcycle.
● Hamas operated tunnels beneath the facility.
● Attacks were launched from inside and around the hospital.
Yes, all of this at a Children’s Hospital.

PALESTINIANS ALSO STATED HAMAS USED GAZA’S HOSPITALS
Gazan activist Amin Abed accused Hamas of turning hospitals into interrogation and torture centers.

He specifically named Al-Shifa, Nasser, Al-Aqsa, and Al-Maamdani hospitals. In April 2025, Islamic Jihad’s armed wing threatened Nasser’s head of nursing after he tried to keep the group’s gunmen out of the wards. A note warned him that he had “crossed the line.”

And while these doctors were serving in Gaza, Tariq Salami Otha Abu Shlouf, spokesperson for the head of Islamic Jihad’s political bureau, stated:
“Terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip are operating from all of the hospitals in the Gaza Strip.”

Dozens of Palestinians made similar claims.

The film excludes all these Palestinian voices because their testimony destroys the film’s central narrative.

HAMAS’S HOSPITAL ABUSE PUT PALESTINIANS IN DANGER
International law gives hospitals special protection.

But a medical site can lose that protection when it is used for military purposes, as Hamas and Islamic Jihad repeatedly did as part of their human-shield strategy.

Any military response must still follow the rules on warnings, precautions, distinction, and proportionality. Israel followed these rules time and time again, even though the film refuses to discuss any of this.

THE DIRECTOR DID NOT INVESTIGATE. SHE CREATED A NARRATIVE.
Director Poh Si Teng described the war as genocide before the film was completed.

She built the project around doctors who shared her same political beliefs.
This is unsurprising, since she had also worked as a documentary producer for Qatar’s state-sponsored propaganda outlet, Al Jazeera.

This project did not begin as an investigation. It began with a verdict and searched for the characters who could deliver it.

The film asks audiences to trust three advocates.

It asks them to ignore the hostages, tunnels, weapons, commanders, intelligence findings, and Palestinian voices that contradict the film. Audiences deserve the full record.

The UN Commission of Inquiry is Back with Another Anti-Israel Smear Report

This is what happens when a biased UN commission launders an accusation through the language of human rights — and celebrities repeat it to millions without understanding the law, the evidence, or the source. Children in Gaza have suffered terribly. Every civilian death is a tragedy.

But tragedy is not genocide and Israel never intentionally targeted civilians, especially children.

Genocide is the gravest accusation in international law. It requires proof of specific intent to destroy a protected people. This report does not meet that standard. Instead, it takes assumptions, inferences, and unverified claims — then packages them as fact.

And now those claims are being used to demonize Israel, erase Hamas’s responsibility, and brand the Jewish state guilty.

This is not accountability.
This is disinformation.
And when artists amplify it, they help turn a false charge into a global blood libel. Words matter. The truth matters.

X